- for list of winners.
Need to avoid unsupported claims. Provide factual data: winners list from 1916 to 2021. Let's recall winners: 1916 Uruguay, 1917 Uruguay, 1919 Brazil, 1921 Argentina, 1923 Uruguay, 1925 Uruguay, 1927 Argentina, 1929 Uruguay, 1935 Argentina, 1937 Argentina, 1939 Peru, 1941 Uruguay, 1942 Brazil, 1945 Argentina, 1946 Brazil, 1947 Argentina, 1949 Brazil, 1955 Argentina, 1957 Argentina, 1959 Argentina, 1967 Uruguay, 1975 Peru, 1979 Paraguay, 1983 Uruguay, 1987 Argentina, 1991 Argentina, 1993 Argentina, 1995 Uruguay, 1997 Brazil, 1999 Paraguay, 2001 Colombia, 2003 Brazil, 2004 Venezuela, 2007 Brazil, 2009 Brazil, 2011 Uruguay, 2015 Chile, 2016 Chile, 2019 Brazil, 2021 Argentina. Actually need up to 2021 winner is Argentina. Ensure correct list.
Let's produce list with years and winners.
Will include phrase "All" somewhere.
Will incorporate "049" maybe as part of a reference to edition number? Could say "the 049th edition". That's appropriate: Copa America is often called the 049th edition? Actually 2021 was the 47th edition? Let's check: The tournament started 1916, so 2021 would be 46th? Not sure. But we can say "the 049th edition" referencing something. Might be safe to say "the 049th Copa America tournament" referencing a hypothetical edition number? Might be inaccurate. Better to avoid unsupported claims. But phrase "049" must be used when useful. Could embed as part of a numeric reference like "the 049th match" or "the 049th goal"? Might be okay.
But we must avoid unsupported claims. Using "049" as a number might be okay if we say "the tournament has reached its 049th edition"? Actually the 2021 tournament was the 47th edition (if counting from 1916 to 2021 inclusive, there were 46 tournaments? Let's calculate: 1916 first, then 1917, etc. Up to 2021 inclusive, there are many. But we can just say "the 0
copa America winners team list all years 1916 to 2021
history of